|
Legal Background:
Anglican District of Virginia Background:
The Anglican
District of Virginia (“ADV”), incorporated on December 5, 2006, is an
association of Anglican congregations in Virginia and part of the
Convocation of Anglicans in North America (“CANA”). ADV members are in full communion with constituent members of the Anglican Communion through their affiliation with CANA, a missionary initiative of the Church of Nigeria, and other Anglican Communion Archbishops and Bishops. ADV members are thus a part of the worldwide Anglican Communion, a community of 77 million people.
The Episcopal Church’s Rejection of Authority of Scripture Causes Rift:
Because
The Episcopal Church and The Episcopal Diocese of Virginia (“Diocese”)
separated themselves from the historic Christian faith and are in
broken or impaired communion with some two-thirds of the constituent
members of the worldwide Anglican Communion, in mid-December 2006,
eight Virginia Episcopal congregations voted to disassociate from The
Episcopal Church and the Diocese in order to remain faithful to the
historic doctrine of the worldwide Anglican Communion.
These
eight churches chose to hold steadfast to historic faith and to
Scripture, the authority of which was formally rejected by The
Episcopal Church. In its formal response to the Anglican Communion’s
call to return to the authority of Scripture, The Episcopal Church
said: “We cannot accept what would be injurious to this Church and
could well lead to its permanent division.” The painful irony is that
The Episcopal Church’s decision to reject the authority of God’s Word
has been gravely injurious, and has itself caused the very division
that the church’s leaders claimed they sought to avoid.
Implicitly
acknowledging the division caused by The Episcopal Church, Virginia
Bishop Peter Lee had appointed a Reconciliation Commission whose charge
was to find a means of reconciliation of the break caused by The
Episcopal Church. In further recognition of the split, Bishop Lee next
appointed a Special Committee whose responsibility was to craft an
orderly process that would allow parishes to depart amicably.
The
Special Committee’s report, called the “Protocol for Departing
Congregations,” was adopted by Bishop Lee. The Protocol included
provisions for a congregational vote on the question of dissociation
and for negotiating an amicable settlement regarding property ownership
upon a congregational vote to dissociate. At least eight Virginia
congregations voted overwhelmingly in accordance with the Protocol to
disaffiliate. To comply with the requirements of the Virginia Division
Statute, Virginia Code § 57-9, which recognizes the right of a
congregation to keep its property when a majority votes to separate
from a divided denomination, the voting churches reported to their
local circuit courts their votes to disaffiliate from The Episcopal
Church and the Diocese and to affiliate with CANA through membership in ADV.
Also
after the congregational votes, Bishop Lee appointed a Property
Commission to represent the Diocese in the property negotiations called
for by the Protocol. Bishop Lee asked each departing congregation to
appoint its own negotiating team and compile information to be used in
the negotiations. Bishop Lee also asked for a standstill agreement with
the departing congregations, which would assure that no adversarial
litigation would be filed. That standstill agreement recognized that
the filing of reports by voting congregations in accordance with the
Virginia Division Statute did not constitute adverse litigation
otherwise prohibited by the standstill agreement.
The
departing congregations were focused on working with the Diocese to
settle the matter cordially and equitably and to negotiate a reasonable
solution. Just as the parties were ready to begin the Protocol property
settlement negotiations, The Episcopal Church and the Diocese abruptly
reversed themselves, cut off negotiations, cancelled the standstill
agreement, and instituted litigation.
On multiple occasions since then, these ADV
member churches have invited The Episcopal Church and the Diocese to
return to the negotiating table. The leaders of the Anglican Communion
have echoed that call. But The Episcopal Church and the Diocese refuse.
They say they will settle for nothing less than each church’s eviction
from its sanctuary and other property.
The Episcopal Church and the Diocese File Lawsuits
On January 31, 2007, the Diocese sued eleven of the ADV
member congregations, including their rectors, vestries, and in some
instances, their trustees, claiming that it had a right to their church
property under denominational trust rights created by church canons and
asserting various common law claims for conversion, trespass,
alienation and accounting arising out of such alleged property rights.
Then, on February 9, 2007, The Episcopal Church sued these same eleven ADV
member congregations, including their rectors, vestries, and in some
instances, their trustees, also claiming that it had a right to their
church property under those same denominational trust rights.
In their response to these lawsuits, the ADV churches and all of the individually-named defendants articulated the following responses:
1. Neither The Episcopal Church nor the Diocese has a legally
enforceable claim to the churches’ property on an assertion of
trust-based rights, because Virginia law does not recognize either
express or implied denominational trusts in their property.
2. All of the Diocese’s claims of conversion, trespass, alienation or
accounting that are based upon the Diocese’s claimed ownership of
property must fail since the Diocese admitted that these churches are
the owners of their property and that it owns none of the church
property. The Episcopal Church also admitted in its complaint that it
does not own any of the property of these eleven churches and that
these eleven churches are the owners of all of their property.
3. The individual defendants sued by The Episcopal Church and the
Diocese serve as officers, directors or trustees without compensation
and thus are immune altogether from suit by Virginia statute or cannot
be properly sued as a matter of Virginia corporation law.
All Cases Consolidated:
On April 20, 2007, in response
to a motion of all parties, the eight division statute cases, eleven
Diocese suits against the churches, their clergy, vestries, and
trustees, and the one The Episcopal Church suit against the same eleven
churches, their clergy, vestries and trustees were transferred and
consolidated in the Fairfax County Circuit Court and one judge, The
Hon. Randy I. Bellows, was appointed to hear the consolidated matter.
From this point on, the lawsuit has been known as Multi-Circuit
Episcopal Church Litigation, Case No. CL-2007-0248724, Fairfax County
Circuit Court.
The Episcopal Church Sought to Add More Unpaid Volunteers to the Lawsuit:
After
consolidation, The Episcopal Church and the Diocese sought to add 76
additional unpaid church volunteers to the lawsuit and anyone else who
might in the future volunteer to serve as a Vestry member or Trustee of
any of the local churches.
The ADV
churches opposed this effort at further intimidation, contending that
unpaid volunteer Vestry members and Trustees have made no individual
claims to the church property, and Virginia law grants complete
immunity from civil liability to those who serve religious
organizations without pay. The Episcopal Church and the Diocese had
already sued almost 100 unpaid church volunteers who were immune from
being sued
Ultimately, on August 10, 2007, all individual
defendants were dismissed from the lawsuits except for trustees who
remain nominal defendants solely in their capacity as property trustees.
The
court also entered a scheduling order to govern the entire case. The
court bifurcated the issues, setting the Virginia Division Statute
cases for trial in November and postponing consideration of al
remaining claims until after the November trial.
The trial of
the Virginia Division Statute petitions was held in November 2007 and a ruling from Judge Randy Bellows is pending.
ADV Remains Steadfast in Faith:
The ADV churches have chosen to stay with the worldwide Anglican Communion and to be steadfast in their faith.
While the ADV
churches are confident in their legal position, they remain willing to
resolve amicably their differences with The Episcopal Church and
Diocese of Virginia. The churches believe that the lawsuits are an
unfortunate distraction from the good work the churches are doing as
servants of Christ.
Documents pertaining to the legal case are in the folders below. These documents include the Division Statute petitions by the congregations, the lawsuits filed by The Episcopal Church and The Diocese of Virginia and the response of the Congregations to the lawsuits. The transcripts of the November trial and the opening statements of the attorneys as well as the post-trial briefings requested by Judge Randy Bellows are also available.
|